Lido (stETH)
Lido is a liquid staking protocol associated with stETH, an Ethereum LST used across many DeFi venues. Review Lido's official materials for the current staking flow, fee model, withdrawal process, and token mechanics before using it.
Liquidly is a liquid staking app and guide for turning staked ETH exposure into a liquid staking token (LST) you can hold, track, and use across DeFi while rewards accrue. Use this page to understand the tradeoffs before connecting a wallet or choosing a provider.
Liquid staking lets you stake a proof-of-stake asset and receive a liquid staking token, or LST, that represents your staked position.
With normal solo staking, your asset is committed to validator duties and liquidity is limited until you exit. With many pooled liquid staking services, you deposit a PoS asset such as ETH, the protocol or provider handles validator operations, and you receive an LST such as stETH, rETH, cbETH, or sfrxETH. That LST can usually be held in your wallet, transferred, traded, or used in DeFi while staking rewards accrue through the token balance or exchange rate. Liquid staking is different from solo staking because you are relying on smart contracts, validator operators, and secondary-market liquidity rather than running validators yourself.
Liquid staking converts a staked position into an LST that can move through DeFi while rewards accrue to the token.
The core flow is simple: deposit, receive, use, and later redeem or exit. The details vary by provider. Some LSTs rebase by increasing wallet balances; others accrue value through a rising exchange rate against the underlying asset. In every case, check the provider's redemption rules, withdrawal queue, fees, and smart-contract design before assuming instant one-to-one liquidity.
Choose a supported proof-of-stake asset, commonly ETH, and deposit it through a liquid staking protocol, provider, or compatible interface after verifying the official contract and current terms.
The protocol issues a liquid staking token, or LST, that represents your staked position. Depending on the design, rewards may accrue through a rebasing balance or an increasing exchange rate.
Hold the LST in self-custody, transfer it, swap it, or use it in compatible DeFi apps. Each added strategy can add smart-contract, liquidation, slippage, and liquidity risk.
Exit by redeeming through the provider, unwrapping where supported, waiting through an unstaking queue, or selling the LST on the market. The best route depends on fees, timing, and available liquidity.
Liquid staking token examples include stETH, rETH, cbETH, and sfrxETH; each has a different provider model, reward design, and risk profile.
These names are market context, not a recommendation. Lido, Rocket Pool, Coinbase, and Frax are widely recognized examples in the Ethereum liquid staking ecosystem, but their contracts, custody assumptions, validator sets, fees, redemption paths, and DeFi integrations are not interchangeable. Liquidly treats LSTs as assets that need due diligence, not as generic ETH substitutes.
Lido is a liquid staking protocol associated with stETH, an Ethereum LST used across many DeFi venues. Review Lido's official materials for the current staking flow, fee model, withdrawal process, and token mechanics before using it.
Rocket Pool describes itself as a decentralized Ethereum staking protocol with liquid and node-staking products. Its rETH token is commonly referenced as an Ethereum liquid staking token with its own protocol design and operator model.
Coinbase Wrapped Staked ETH, or cbETH, represents ETH staked through Coinbase and is designed as a transferable wrapped token. Coinbase notes that cbETH can trade differently from ETH because it reflects staked ETH plus accrued rewards.
Frax's sfrxETH is described in Frax documentation as an ERC-4626 vault token designed to accrue staking yield from Frax ETH validators. Its reward mechanics differ from simple balance-rebasing LSTs.
Liquid staking improves liquidity, solo staking maximizes direct control, and pooled or exchange staking reduces setup work with added trust assumptions.
The right route depends on capital, technical skill, custody preference, and risk tolerance. Solo staking generally requires validator operations and a meaningful deposit size. Pooled staking can lower the minimum and abstract validator work. Liquid staking adds a tradable LST, which can help with liquidity but also creates token, smart-contract, and market risk.
| Method | Liquidity | Watch for |
|---|---|---|
| Liquid staking | High (LST) | LST depeg, smart-contract risk, provider design, validator and slashing risk |
| Solo staking | Low | Validator uptime, technical setup, direct slashing/penalty exposure, exit timing |
| Pooled/exchange | Varies | Custody terms, provider trust, fees, redemption rules, centralization concerns |
Liquid staking is not risk-free: an LST can depeg, smart contracts can fail, validators can be penalized, and provider concentration can matter.
An LST can trade below the underlying asset if liquidity thins, redemptions slow, confidence drops, or broader market stress hits DeFi. Smart-contract bugs, oracle issues, governance decisions, validator downtime, and slashing can also affect outcomes. Self-custody improves control over your tokens, but it does not remove protocol risk, market risk, wallet risk, or the need to manage private keys securely.
Liquid staking rewards are variable, APY is indicative only, and fees can come from the protocol, the network, and DeFi activity around the LST.
Most users should treat displayed APY as a live estimate, not a promise. Rewards can change with network participation, validator performance, priority fees, MEV policy, provider fees, and protocol rules. You may also pay network gas to deposit, swap, approve, bridge, redeem, or use the LST in DeFi. Some protocols take a fee from staking rewards before distributing the remainder to token holders.
Liquid staking is a way to stake a proof-of-stake asset while receiving a liquid staking token, or LST, that represents the staked position. Instead of waiting with an illiquid stake, you can usually hold, transfer, trade, or use the LST in DeFi. The LST may accrue rewards through its balance or exchange rate. It is still exposed to protocol, validator, and market risk.
Normal staking often means locking assets directly with validator infrastructure or using a provider without a freely transferable token. Liquid staking adds an LST, which can make the position more usable before you exit staking. The tradeoff is complexity. You gain liquidity and DeFi composability, but you add smart-contract risk, possible depeg risk, provider risk, and fees that do not exist in the same way with direct solo staking.
A liquid staking token is a tokenized representation of a staked asset. Examples in Ethereum market context include stETH, rETH, cbETH, and sfrxETH. An LST can track rewards in different ways: some balances rebase, while others increase in value against the underlying asset over time. Because an LST trades in markets, its price can move away from the underlying asset, especially during stress or low liquidity.
Liquid staking is not risk-free. Main risks include smart-contract bugs, oracle issues, governance changes, validator downtime, slashing, provider concentration, wallet compromise, and secondary-market liquidity problems. Self-custody can keep the LST in your wallet, but it does not remove protocol or market risk. Before depositing, verify official documentation, contract addresses, fees, withdrawal rules, and whether the provider has the risk controls you expect.
Yes. An LST can trade below the value of the underlying asset, often called a depeg or discount. That can happen if many holders want to exit, liquidity is thin, redemptions are delayed, or trust in a provider changes. If you sell during a discount, you may receive less than the expected underlying value. Slashing, smart-contract failures, and DeFi liquidation risk can also create losses.
Rewards depend on the network, validator performance, provider fees, protocol rules, and market conditions. Any APY shown for liquid staking should be treated as indicative only, not guaranteed. Some protocols take a fee from staking rewards before passing the rest to holders. You should also account for gas, swap slippage, bridge costs, and DeFi strategy risk, which can materially change your net outcome.